The Acceptance of Wayang Kamasan Porcelain Ceramics at Petitenget Temple Bali

The Acceptance of Wayang Kamasan Porcelain Ceramics at Petitenget Temple Bali

Authors

  • Sunarini Rai Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Denpasar
  • Mudra I Wayan Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Denpasar
  • Saraswati Anak Agung Ayu Oka Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Udayana
  • Muka I Ketut Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Denpasar
  • Karja I Wayan Faculty of Fine Arts and Design, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v39i3.2795

Keywords:

Kata Kunci : Keberterimaan, Keramik Porselin, Wayang Kamasan, Pura Petitenget

Abstract

Temples, integral to Hindu Dharma worship, are quintessential features of Balinese architectural tradition. Among these, Petitenget Temple stands out with its distinctive interior, adorned with ceramic plates embellishing the pelinggih (shrine). This study focuses on Petitenget Temple, where porcelain ceramic plates featuring the Wayang Kamasan motif are utilized within the Tri Angga framework, representing a novel exploration. Research related to the study of the use of porcelain ceramics as ornaments in old buildings in Bali. Previous research has been carried out but has not been studied in depth on the use of Wayang Kamasan motifs on pelinggih with the Tri Angga concept in particular. This research aims to reveal the form, meaning, and aesthetic value of porcelain ceramics with wayang kamasan motifs as ornaments on pelinggih. Using qualitative methods with a descriptive approach, data collection involved observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and data reduction flow. Meanwhile, the data source sampling technique uses purposive sampling. The findings obtained through analysis of the Wayang Kamasan motif applied to porcelain ceramic plates at Petitenget Temple, Kerobokan Badung, are the harmony of Wayang motif porcelain ceramics, as a prototype or reference for preserving the use of Wayang Kamasan motif porcelain ceramics in sacred buildings and other functions, and temple visitors can enjoy the form, meaning, and aesthetics displayed by the porcelain ceramics with Wayang Kamasan motifs installed. From this research, it can be concluded that Wayang Kamasan porcelain ceramics are accepted by the community, temple owners, or Petitenget Temple owners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariqoh, F. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberterimaan Penerapan Kartu Kontrol Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).

Artha, O. (2019). Taksu Dibalik Pembangunan Pariwisata Bali (2nd ed., Vol. 2). PT. Percetakan Bali.

Cahyadi, I., & Artawan, C. (2015). Membaca Bahasa Rupa Ilustrasi Palelintangan Di Bale Kambang Taman Gili Klungkung. Segara Widya : Jurnal Penelitian Seni, 3. https://doi.org/10.31091/sw.v3i0.214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31091/sw.v3i0.214

Cecep, T. and E. M. (2013). Kesehatan Lingkungan dan K3. Nuha Medika.

Cintyadewi, P. (2022). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Karakter Visual Piring Keramik sebagai Ornamen di Pura Petitenget Kabupaten Badung. Universitas Udayana.

Gde, A. A., Udayana, B., Desain, J., Visual, K., Rupa, S., & Desain, D. (2017). Marginalisasi Ideologi Tri Hita Karana pada Media Promosi Pariwisata Budaya di Bali. Jurnal Seni Budaya, 32(1), 110-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v32i1.4

Goris, R. (2012). Sifat Religius Masyarakat Pedesaan di Bali. Udayana University Press dan Pusat Kajian Bali Unud.

Hendriyana, H. (2015). Rupa Dasar: Dasar-Dasar Teknis Keindahan Visual (1st ed., Vol. 1). Sunan Ambu Press, STSI Bandung.

Lexy J, M. (2013). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda.

Mahaputra, I. N. G. (2009). Arsip Arsitektur Bali.

Mahardika, F. (2010). Tinjauan Bangunan Pura di Indonesia.

Mudana, I., & Ribek, P. (2017). Komodifikasi Seni Lukis Wayang Kamasan Sebagai Produk Industri Kreatif Penunjang Pariwisata. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 32. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v32i1.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v32i1.83

Mudra, I. W., Sunarini, N. M. R., & Utomo, A. M. (2018). Keramik Porselin pada Bangunan Kuno di Bali. Denpasar, Bali. Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Desain: ISI Denpasar.

Ponimin. (2010). Desain dan Teknik Berkarya Kriya Keramik (T. Raharjo, Ed.; Vol. 1). CV. Lubuk Agung.

Sachari, A. (2002). Estetika: Makna, Simbol, dan Daya. ITB.

Saraswati, O. (2023). Metoda Saraswati Penikmatan Estetika Tempat (1st ed., Vol. 1). Pohon Cahaya.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Sunarini, N., & Mudra, I. W. (2012). Studi Pemanfaatan Keramik Porselin sebagai Ornamen pada Bangunan-Bangunan Tua di Bali sebagai Antisipasi Terhadap Kehancurannya.

Suwandi, I. N. (2022). Hasil Wawancara Pengempon Pura Petitenget.

Syawaludin, M. (2017). Teori Sosial Budaya dan Methodenstreit. Noer Fikri.

Utomo, A. (2007). Wawasan Tunjauan Seni Keramik. Paramita.

Downloads

Published

04-07-2024

How to Cite

Rai, S., I Wayan, M., Anak Agung Ayu Oka, S., I Ketut, M., & I Wayan, K. (2024). The Acceptance of Wayang Kamasan Porcelain Ceramics at Petitenget Temple Bali. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 39(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v39i3.2795

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...