Evaluating Intangible Cultural Heritage Policy of Balinese Handwoven Textiles

Agung Parameswara

doi:10.31091/mudra.v39i2.2582

Evaluating Intangible Cultural Heritage Policy of Balinese Handwoven Textiles

Authors

Agung Parameswara Faculty of Economy and Business Warmadewa University, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v39i2.2582

Keywords:

Intangible Cultural Heritage, traditional textiles, sustainability, policy, cultural economics

Abstract

Several key factors drive contemporary concerns about the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage. Cultural policy has given meaning and importance to the cultural diversity of society. However, the efforts to preserve intangible cultural heritage by providing a way to community welfare are facing new challenges. The article aims to present an analysis of local cultural policy from Bali Governance to sustain the intangible heritage of handwoven textiles by increasing the economy demand. Using a focus group approach, qualitative data were collected and using Nvivo12 to analyze the data from 15 interviews of weavers and practices of Balinese handwoven textiles living in Bali. This approach is used as a means to represent the complex diversity of opinions among members of the weaving group in a dynamic interaction that is provided so that a diversity of views emerges from the participants and direct clarification of the issues that influence the diversity of arguments on the reality of the impact on policy. The result found that the cultural policy is increasing the sense of identity by using Balinese handwoven textiles and significantly has the direct impact for the demand of handwoven textiles. Furthermore, the research revealed that cultural policy plays important role in shaping and reviving the traditional practices by evaluating the challenges of cultural industries such as industrialization, regeneration knowledge, environmental sustainability by reducing chemical dyes, the welfare of women weavers, market access and strong representation between communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bali, N. (2019). Kerajinan Tenun Songket Beratan Minim Penerus. Www.Nusabali.Com. https://www.nusabali.com/berita/58665/kerajinan-tenun-songket-beratan-minim-penerus

Bali, N. (2020). Para Perajinnya Sudah Sepuh, Dianggap Kuno Anak Muda Gengsi Jadi Penenun. Www.Nusabali.Com. https://www.nusabali.com/berita/78949/para-perajinnya-sudah-sepuh-dianggap-kuno-anak-muda-gengsi-jadi-penenun

Bali, R. (2019). Minim Regenerasi Penenun, Tenun Songket Beratan Terancam Punah. Www.Radarbali.Jawapos.Com. https://radarbali.jawapos.com/read/2019/12/22/171345/minim-regenerasi-penenun-tenun-songket-beratan-terancam-punah

Balipost. (2019). Kain Bordir Menyerupai Bordir Makin Digandrungi, Tenun Asli Bali Dikhawatirkan Punah. Www.Balipost.Com. https://www.balipost.com/news/2019/06/10/77335/Kain-Bordir-Menyerupai-Tenun-Makin...html

Balipost. (2020). Tenun Terancam Punah. Www.Balipost.Com. https://www.balipost.com/news/2020/01/15/98896/Tenun-Terancam-Punah.html

Blake, J. (2009). UNESCO’s 2003 convention on intangible cultural heritage: the impli- cations of community involvement in “safeguarding”. In In: L. Smith and N. Akagawa eds. Intangible heritage. (pp. 45–73.). Oxon: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In In: Richardson, J., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood: 241–58. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338

Dedy Prayatna, I. W., Santosa, H., & Ratna Cora, T. I. (2021). Perkembangan Fungsi dan Makna Kain Tenun Gotya dalam Industri Fashion. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 36(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v36i1.1101

Dessein, J., Soini, K., Fairclough, G., & Horlings, L. (2015). Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development. Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability. In Culture in, for and as Sustainable Development. https://www.culturalsustainability.eu/

Duxbury, N., & Jeannotte, M. S. (2011). Introduction: Culture and Sustainable Communities. Culture and Local Governance, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18192/clg-cgl.v3i1.181

Duxbury, N., Kangas, A., & De Beukelaer, C. (2017). Cultural policies for sustainable development: four strategic paths. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1280789

Einarsson, Á. (2016). cultural economics. In Bifröst University. Bifröst University.

Farid, H. (2021). Kebijakan Pelestarian Warisan Budaya.

Fleming, R. C. (2010). Creative Economic Development, Sustainability, and Exclusion in Rural Areas*. Geographical Review, 99(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2009.tb00418.x

Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture’s essential role in public planning. In Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd in association with the Cultural Development Network(Vic).https://www.culturaldevelopment.net.au/community/Downloads/HawkesJon(2001)TheFourthPillarOfSustainability.pdf

Hollis, V., Openshaw, S., & Goble, R. (2002). Conducting focus groups: Purpose and practicalities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260206500102

Kim, W. (2009). Drinking culture of elderly Korean immigrants in Cnada: A focus group study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 24(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-009-9104-z

Kompas, L. (2019). Kebangkitan Kembali Tenun Bali. In Penerbit Buku Kompas. PT Kompas Media Nusantara Jakarta.

Krueger, R. A. (1994). (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. In Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (2nd ed.).

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). Beyond Constant Comparison Qualitative Data Analysis: Using NVivo. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022711

Morgan, D. (1998). The Focus Group Guidebook. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328164

Mulcahy, K. V. (2006). Cultural policy: Definitions and theoretical approaches. Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, 35(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.3200/JAML.35.4.319-330

O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Parameswara, A., Nyoman Saskara, I. A., Utama, M. S., & Wiwin Setyari, N. P. (2021). The Role of Place Identity, Local Genius, Orange Economy and Cultural Policies for Sustainability of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Bali. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(8), 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160816

Parameswara, A., Saskara, I. A. N., Utama, I. M. S., & Setyari, N. P. W. (2022). Exploring Cultural Value and its Sustainability of Balinese Handwoven Textiles. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2022.2043517

Pebryani, N. D., C.S, T. I. R., Remawa, A. A. R., & Radiawan, I. M. (2022). Digital Transformation in Endek Weaving Tradition. MUDRA Jurnal Seni Budaya, 37(1), 78–84.

Pebryani, N. D., Ratna, C.S., T. I., & Manik Prihatini, P. (2022). Design Application for Balinese Songket Weaving Motif. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 37(3), 312–318. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v37i3.2025

Petrova, L. (2011). David Throsby: The economics of cultural policy. Journal of Cultural Economics, 35(3), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-011-9138-2

Portolés, B. (2015). UNESCO’s work on culture and sustainable development: evaluation of a policy theme. November. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002344/234443E.pdf

Rentschler, R. (2002). The entrepreneurial arts leader: Cultural policy, change and reinvention. In Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.

Schuster, J. M. (2003). Mapping State Cultural Policy: The State of Washington. In The University of Chicago, Cultural Policy Center.

Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(2), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167

Syssner, J. (2009). Conceptualizations of culture and identity in regional policy. Regional and Federal Studies, 19(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560902957518

Throsby, D. (1995). Culture, economics and sustainability. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074049

Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1–2), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781008003.00025

Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. In published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom. published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v22i1.1035

Throsby, D. (2017). Culturally sustainable development: theoretical concept or practical policy instrument? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2017.1280788

UNESCO. (1998). Intergovernmental Conference on Cultural Policies for Development. In Final Report (Issues 20 March-2 April 1998). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.127.2707&rep=rep1&type=pdf%5Cnhttps://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001139/113935eo.pdf

UNESCO. (2015). Re | Shaping Cultural Policies. In the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

UNESCO. (2019). Culture and Public Policy for Sustainable Development. In Culture and Public Action. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8047-4787-3

UNESCO. (2020). Basic Texts of the 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. In UNESCO.

WCCD. (1995). Review & Booknote: Our Creative Diversity: Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development. In Report of the World Commission for Culture and Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x9708500132

WCED. (1987). WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) Our Common Future. In Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wiktor-Mach, D. (2020). What role for culture in the age of sustainable development? UNESCO’s advocacy in the 2030 Agenda negotiations. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1534841

Williams, R. (1985). Keywords : a vocabulary of culture and society. In New York :Oxford University Press. Revised edition. New York : Oxford University Press, 1985. ©1983. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999558053702121

Yang, Y., Shafi, M., Song, X., & Yang, R. (2018). Preservation of cultural heritage embodied in traditional crafts in the developing countries. A case study of Pakistani handicraft industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051336